Skip to content
Bonzer / SEO / Content Strategies / Internal Link Building

Internal Link Building

Internal link building shows search engines, AI crawlers and your visitors which pages matter most. Build a link structure that lifts rankings and conversions.

Earning relevant links from other websites is hard, slow work, and it is the part of SEO most teams budget for. Internal linking is roughly as important and costs you nothing but attention. It is the one lever where you control every variable: which pages get the authority, which pages get found, and where a reader goes next.

Internal link building is the deliberate placement of links between the pages of your own site. Done properly, it moves visitors sensibly from one page to the next, and it tells search engines how your content fits together. Alongside your sitemap, internal links are how the machines learn that your site is navigable at all.

The important word is deliberate. Every site has internal links. Very few have an internal link structure that anybody planned.

They distribute authority. Links from other domains bring value into your site. Internal links decide where that value ends up. A page nobody links to internally is a page you have decided is unimportant, whether you meant to or not.

They teach the machines your hierarchy. Crawlers discover pages by following links, and the pattern of internal links is one of the clearest signals of which pages you consider central. This is the same mechanism described in crawling and indexing, and it is why a page buried six clicks deep gets crawled less often than one linked from your navigation.

They move people toward conversion. Most visitors do not land on the page that sells. They land on the page that answers a question, and whether they get any further is down to what you linked to from there.

Where the gains are largest

Large sites and webshops see the biggest effect, simply because they have the most to organize. A shop with a few thousand SKUs quickly runs into tens of thousands of URLs across products, categories, filters and brands, and at that scale the internal structure is the difference between a catalogue Google understands and a catalogue it samples at random.

There is a second benefit that is easy to miss: internal linking expands your keyword coverage. Every well-linked category and subcategory page is another opportunity to be relevant for another set of searches. A shop selling cycling jerseys can be relevant for the brand, the type, the colour and the sleeve length at once, but only if those pages exist, sit in a logical hierarchy, and are linked from somewhere sensible. The structural side of that decision is covered in taxonomy and architecture.

The conversion argument holds for any business model. A visitor might arrive on an informational blog post, click through to a category page, and convert on a product. Every step in that journey is an internal link somebody either placed or forgot to place.

Topic clusters give the structure a shape

The most reliable pattern for editorial content is the topic cluster: one pillar page covering a broad subject, with cluster pages going deep on the subtopics, all linked to the pillar and back again.

Pillar pageCluster page 1Cluster page 2Cluster page 3
"How to start a business""Steps for starting a business""Legal considerations for starting a business""Financing options for starting a business"

The pillar acts as the hub, the cluster pages carry the specific searches, and the internal links between them make the relationship explicit rather than implied. Four things follow from it: the structure is easier for people and crawlers to read, the topical authority accumulates in one place instead of scattering, the internal links pass value to the pages you care about, and the specific subtopics pull in traffic with clearer intent. Which entities and subtopics belong in a cluster is a question of semantic SEO.

1. The navigation carries your most important pages

Almost every site has a main menu that appears on every page, and space in it is finite. Choose what goes there by commercial importance, not by org chart. If a page matters to the business, a visitor should reach it within three clicks of the front page.

Drop-downs give you room to link to more of the pages that matter, and it is worth linking to your highest-converting page from more than one place in the menu. It is also worth linking between your important pages directly, and toward whatever you are pushing this quarter: a campaign page linked from the front page will always outperform the same page linked from nowhere.

2. Editorial content is where most of the linking happens

A blog is the natural home for internal linking, because the reader arrived wanting to understand something and is receptive to being pointed further. Build a natural flow of links out of your informational content and you extend the visit, which gives people time to remember who you are or to convert. The commercial half of that mechanism is covered in CRO in content.

Use descriptive anchor text that says what the reader will get, and vary it naturally rather than repeating the same exact-match phrase on every link. The reasoning behind that balance is set out in anchor text strategy.

The single best rule is to add the link only where it genuinely helps. A link inserted because a keyword happened to appear irritates readers and adds nothing for search engines. A product page for a pair of trousers linking to a dinner recipe is the extreme version, but softer versions of the same mistake are everywhere: links added to hit a quota rather than to answer the question the reader is now holding.

What to look for when you audit

Three problems account for most of the damage, and all three are findable with a crawl:

  • Orphan pages with no internal links pointing at them. They are published, indexed at best occasionally, and invisible in the structure.
  • Broken internal links pointing at URLs that moved or died. Every one of them is a dead end for a reader and a wasted crawl for a bot.
  • Redirect chains in internal links. When a URL changes, the fix is to update the links, not to rely on the redirect. Sites that skip that step end up routing every internal click through a hop it did not need.

Run that check on a rhythm rather than once. A living site breaks its own links every time somebody renames a page.

Want to know how your internal structure holds up, and which of your commercial pages are currently starved of it? A free SEO analysis covers it, and on-page optimization is where we do the work.

Thomas Bogh
Thomas Bogh

CPO & Partner

Thomas is CPO and Partner at Bonzer, responsible for analyzing search engine algorithms and SEO product development. All content and data on this page has been reviewed and fact-checked by Thomas.

Frederik Thyssen smiling with arms crossed

Get a clear view of your potential

An informal analysis of your domain. Classic search and AI-search.

Free SEO analysis

Based on experience from more than 3,000 analyses and 1,000+ companies